A live, source-tiered front end for AI industry coverage. It separates reports by source class, shows claim-relative evidence and denominator checks, and links relevant portfolio research without treating the link as verification. Daily machine labels remain visibly unreviewed until checked by a person. Failed or deferred assessments remain visible, and incomplete coverage is reported. The publication path stops on invalid data or a failed verification step; this does not establish comprehensive coverage or classification accuracy.
The corrected v1.1 paper preserves a historical public-evidence snapshot of twelve consumer AI products. It identifies unresolved cells, capture-state limits and the difference between a bounded negative search and an established absence. The linked explorer retains the historical scores. This is not a current compliance assessment or a completed repeat survey.
TOOL 03 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20559430DEFLATION CALCULATOR
How much announced generation and data-centre load actually get delivered. A deflation calculator runs announced generation through measured PJM-queue attrition stages, and the load side displays operator-vetted PJM and ERCOT large-load screens with a two-rail envelope (≈20% floor to ≈48–63% ceiling).
TOOL 04 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21318960WATER EXPLORER
Which water figures are measured, which are planning assumptions, and what kind of water is involved. Reporting years and metrics are selectable, every site carries its evidence status, and unknown water sources stay visible rather than inferred.
TOOL 05 · ISSUE 6 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20541643UNIT ECONOMICS
Whether the AI buildout's unit economics are holding. Per-edition signal and developments, or one indicator tracked across issues. The signal it watches, a hyperscaler capex-guidance down-revision, has not fired in six issues.
TOOL 06 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20572928FORECAST MATRIX
How the field forecasts data-centre electricity demand. Dispersion is measured only within comparable slices, since units and scopes are not interchangeable, and each forecast is traced through a transparency funnel from verified to confirmable to reproducible.
TOOL 07 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20680108GOVERNANCE AUDIT
A dated comparison of SEC Summary Compensation Table totals and Compensation Actually Paid. CAP is a fair-value remeasurement, not cash received. Board-target cases have separate coverage and are shown alongside peer-relative returns; the comparison does not establish that a CEO caused a return.
TOOL 08 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21543579MODEL DIAGNOSTIC
The corrected v1.1 release distinguishes model-run provenance from answer checking in financial data extraction. Selected calculations and tables are reconstructed from stored outputs, with a corrected source label and explicit historical input limits. It reports open-weight experiments only; no new model runs or deployment validation are claimed.
TOOL 09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21740081DATASET DIAGNOSTIC
The filter behind a widely used training corpus keeps documents scoring 3 or more, and that 3 is a rounded integer. The raw cut is adjustable across the 233 score values observed in this sample, the rounding rule can be switched to move 458,461 documents across the boundary, and the rounding identity is shown in the page. The explorer uses corrected content-only token counts. Its historical fixed-score panel remains unavailable pending recalculation; the historical PDF and dataset are unchanged.
A six-stage research protocol and deterministic gate for recording scope choices, source custody, claim types and departures across independent runs. It makes process divergence inspectable; it does not establish that a finding is correct.
A Linux source alpha for small organisations that need evidence of locality and reproducible model operation. It provides exact local model identity, bounded embedded libllama serving, authenticated loopback transport and metadata-only inference receipts. The accepted result covers one synthetic L3 trial, not production readiness, repeated-run reliability, model quality or comparative performance.
Audits, Diagnostics & Methods (2)
DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21325372PUBLISHED 18 AUG 2026EVIDENTIARY AUDIT
A motive-neutral referee for the "AI writes most of our code" claims. It grades twelve vendor and adopter statements on four evidentiary tests: whether a denominator is stated, whether the figure is externally audited, whether an outsider could reproduce it, and whether a named party with no stake has checked that specific figure. One of twelve defines a rigorous denominator, none is audited, none is reproducible, and two carry an independent check.
DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20374960PUBLISHED 2026NEGATIVE RESULT
The UK counterpart to the infrastructure analysis. Britain's electricity demand connection queue grew from 41 GW to 125 GW in seven months, with roughly 73 GW in data centres. Evaluates the gap between speculative announcements and binding final investment decisions.
DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20512703PUBLISHED 08 JUL 2026ENERGY BOUND
A transparent order-of-magnitude bound on the electricity used by automated web traffic. A naive multiply yields 257 TWh a year; two distinct methods bracket the figure at order 10 TWh, exposing the parametric sensitivity of traffic-to-energy models.
Governance, Reliance & Consumer Protection (6)
DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20763480PUBLISHED 18 JUL 2026RELIANCE TRILOGY
A reproducible measure of systematic AI dependency across four layers (reliability, downstream attribution, penetration, reversibility), with a dated off-switch register and demand-side cohort analysis from provider telemetry and government data.
DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20807278PUBLISHED 19 JUL 2026CONSUMER RELIANCE
How individual AI dependency is built, priced, and made hard to leave: a reproducible profile of the commercial machinery (pricing tiers, caps, metering, portability) across US, EU, Chinese and companion providers, with a revealed-elasticity test of user retention.
DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20941003PUBLISHED 26 JUN 2026HOUSEHOLD INCIDENCE
A reproducible ledger of how the AI data-centre build-out reaches a single household (device prices, AI-laden subscriptions, electricity, public subsidy and retirement exposure), with each channel's AI-attributable share bounded across two archetype households.
DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20790896PUBLISHED 20 JUL 2026AGENTIC COMMERCE
An evidence review of agent-mediated retail: why the neutral agent is a structural fallacy, who controls downstream purchase funnels, and which consumer protection boundaries remain legally enforceable.
DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20788844PUBLISHED 19 JUL 2026CONSUMER PROTECTION
An empirical survey of commercial choice architecture and deceptive design patterns in digital retail environments, mapping why individual consumer vigilance fails against systematic behavioural steering.
DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20778968PUBLISHED 04 JUL 2026LABOUR ECONOMICS
A reproducible map of where AI-fluency becomes part of the job: occupation-level AI-usage penetration crossed with the augment/automate mix, derived from the open Anthropic Economic Index.
Finance, Markets & Valuation (3)
DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20586863UPDATED 23 SEP 2026 · v7.1CAPEX INFRASTRUCTURE
A dated assessment of selected commitments, delivery stages and access obligations. The accompanying bundle recalculates named balances, rebuilds selected numerical content and tables, and lets readers inspect a quantity with its source and qualifications. These checks do not establish source truth or a causal account of the infrastructure build-out.
DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20672581PUBLISHED 14 JUL 2026VALUATION BENCHMARK
A dated assessment of infrastructure constraints and investment claims. Version 2.1 adds an offline reproduction bundle to the v2 analysis. The deposit identifies unresolved sources and calculations included only in the bundle; the reproduction result is not verification of every source claim.
About the evidence
Research Records
Versioned
Versioned records; reproduction coverage and unresolved checks are stated per project
Jurisdiction Evidence
Source-linked
Versioned local packs; custody checks do not establish legal correctness or complete coverage
Compensation Evidence
SEC filings
Dated issuer universe; CAP, cash received and board targets are distinct measures