What twelve consumer AI products publicly evidenced against the EU AI Act's Article 50
transparency clauses on 5 and 6 August 2026, four days after the duty began to apply. Every cell is one
question of the form is evidence of this publicly available, yes or no. Click any cell to read the
artefact it rests on, the date it was captured and the account state it was seen in. This is not a
compliance assessment, and no cell should be read as one.
AI disclosure: parts of this page were artificially generated with AI
assistance and reviewed by the author. The model, and the conflict it creates, are named in
the note at the foot of the page.
5/12evidence a disclosure at the point of interaction (1.1)
2/12mark across every output type they generate (2.4)
0/12evidence accessibility of the disclosure (5.2)
2 Dec 2026the 50(2) marking transitional deadline; re-run follows
✓ evidenced (artefact opened, evidences the item)✗ not evidenced (artefact opened, does not)○ no artefact found (a statement about a bounded search)
The 50(7) column is the Code of Practice signatory status. It is reported beside the
table and is never added to the ten-item total. “no” is drawn neutral, not red: this measures
public evidence, not compliance.
December re-run.
The same eleven questions will be asked again shortly after the 50(2) transitional deadline on 2 December
2026, with this rubric unchanged. The movement between the two runs is the intended result, and the second
column lands here beside the first.